My econ
Author: s | 2025-04-23
My Econ Lab Question answers. my econ lab question answers chapters and competitive market is one that has many buyers and sellers, so no single buyer or Pearson Higher Education’s My Econ Lab teaches basic economic concepts to college students. FableVision developed five browser-based interactive experiments for My Econ Lab. These
My Econ Review: Not a Scam But is it Worth it?
Cooper WW (1968) Programming with linear fractional functionals. Nav Res Logist Q 15:517–522 Google Scholar Charnes AC, Cooper WW, Mellon B (1952) Blending aviation gasolines – a study in programming interdependent activities in an integrated oil company. Econometrica 20(2):135–159 Google Scholar Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2(6):429–444 Google Scholar Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1979) Short communication: measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 3(4):339 Google Scholar Coelli T, Lauwers L, Van Huylenbroeck GV (2007) Environmental efficiency measurement and the materials balance condition. J Prod Anal 28:3–12 Google Scholar Cooper WW, Thompson RG, Thrall RM (1996) Introduction: extensions and new developments in DEA. Ann Oper Res 66:3–45 Google Scholar Cooper WW, Park SK, Pastor JT (1999) RAM: a range adjusted measure of inefficiency for use with additive models, and relations to other models and measures in DEA. J Prod Anal 11:5–42 Google Scholar Cooper WW, Seiford L, Tone K (2002) Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with uses, example applications, references and DEA-solver software. Kluwer, Norwell Google Scholar Cropper ML, Oates WE (1992) Environmental economics: a survey. J Econ Lit 30:675–740 Google Scholar Dantzig GB (1951) Maximization of a linear function of variables subject to linear inequalities. In: Koopmans TC (ed) Activity analysis of production and allocation. Wiley, New York, pp 339–347 Google Scholar Dapko KH, Jeanneauxe P, Latruffe L (2016) Modeling pollution generating technologies in performance benchmarking: recent developments, limits, and future prospects in the non-parametric framework. Eur J Oper Res 250:347–359 Google Scholar Debreu G (1951) The coefficient of resource utilization. Econometrica 19(3):273–292 Google Scholar Färe R, Grosskopf S (2003) Nonparametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs: comment. Am J Agric Econ 85:1070–1074 Google Scholar Färe R, Lovell CAK (1978) Measuring the technical efficiency of production. J Econ Theory 19(1):150–162 Google Scholar Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK (1985) The measurement of efficiency of production. Kluwer-Nijhoff, Boston Google Scholar Färe R, Grosskopf S, Kokkelenberg EC (1989) Measuring plant capacity, utilization and technical change: a nonparametric approach. Int Econ Rev 30(3):655–666 Google Scholar Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK, Pasurka C (1989) Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: a non-parametric approach. Rev Econ Stat 71(1):90–98 Google Scholar Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK, Yaisawarng S (1993) Derivation of shadow prices for undesirable outputs: a distance function approach. Rev Econ Stat 75:374–380 Google Scholar Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK (1994) Production frontiers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar Färe R, Grosskopf S, Noh DW, Weber W (2005) Characteristics of a polluting technology: theory and practice. J Econ 126:469–492 Google Scholar Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of technical efficiency. J R Stat Soc Ser A Gen 120(Part 3):253–281 Google Scholar Førsund F (2009) Good modelling of bad outputs: pollution and multiple-output production. Int Rev Environ Resour Econ 3(1):1–38 Google Scholar Førsund F (2018) Multi-equation modeling of desirable and undesirable outputs satisfying the material balance. Empir Econ, online 54(1):67–99 Google Scholar Frisch R (1965) Theory of production. Rand McNally and Company, Chicago Google Scholar Hampf B (2014) Separating environmental efficiency into production and abatement efficiency: a nonparametric model with application to US power plants. J Prod Anal 41:457–473 Google Scholar Hanoch G, Rothschild M (1972) Testing the assumptions of production theory: a nonparametric approach. J Polit Econ 80(2):256–275 Google Scholar Johansen L (1968) Production functions and the concept of capacity. Reprinted in Førsund FR (ed) Collected works of Leif Johansen, vol 1. North Holland, Amsterdam Google Scholar Koopmans TJ (1951) Analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. In: Koopmans TJ (ed) Activity analysis of production and allocation. Wiley, New York, pp 33–97 Google Scholar Koopmans TJ (1957) Three essays on the state of economic science. McGraw Hill, New York Google Scholar Kumbhakar S, Lovell CAK (2000) Stochastic frontier analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York Google Scholar Leleu H, Briec W (2009) A DEA estimation of a lower bound for firms’ allocative efficiency without information on price data. Int J Prod Econ 121:203–211 Google Scholar Lozano SC (2015) A joint-inputs network DEA approach to production and pollution-generating technologies. Expert Syst Appl 42:7960–7968 Google Scholar Luenberger DG (1992) Benefit functions and duality. J Math Econ 21:115–145 Google Scholar Murty S, Russell RR (2016) Modeling emission-generating technologies: reconciliation of axiomatic and by-production approaches. Empir Econ 54(1):7–30 Google Scholar Murty S, Russell R, Levkoff SB (2012) On modeling pollution-generating technologies. J Environ Econ Manag 64:117–135 Google Scholar Pastor JT, Louis JL, Sirvent I (1999) An enhanced DEA Russell-graph efficiency measure. Eur J Oper Res 115:596–607 Google Scholar Pethig R (2006) Non-linear production, abatement, pollution and materials balance reconsidered. J Environ Econ Manag 51:185–204 Google Scholar Portela MCAS, Thanassoulis E (2005) Profitability of a sample of Portuguese bank branches and its decomposition into technical and allocative components. Eur J Oper Res 162(3):850–866 Google Scholar Ray SC (1988) Data envelopment analysis, non-discretionary inputs and efficiency: an alternative interpretation. Socio Econ Plan Sci 22(4):167–176 Google Scholar Ray SC (1991) Resource-use efficiency in public schools: a study of Connecticut data. Manag Sci 37(12):1620–1628 Google Scholar Ray SC (2004) Data envelopment analysis: theory and techniques for economics and operations research. Cambridge University Press, New York Google Scholar Ray SC (2007) Shadow profit maximization and a measure of overall inefficiency. J Prod Anal 27:231–236 Google Scholar Ray SC (2009) Are Indian firms too small? A nonparametric analysis of cost efficiency and the optimal organization of industry in Indian manufacturing. Indian Econ Rev XXXXVI(1):49–67 Google Scholar Ray SC (2010) A one-step procedure for returns to scale classification of decision making units in data envelopment analysis. University of Connecticut Economics working paper 2010-07 Google Scholar Ray SC (2015) Nonparametric measures of scale economies and capacity utilization: an application to U.S. manufacturing. Eur J Oper Res 245:602–611 Google Scholar Ray SC, Ghose A (2014) Production efficiency in Indian agriculture: an assessment of the post green revolution years. Omega 44:58–69 Google Scholar Ray SC, Jeon Y (2009) Reputation and efficiency: a non-parametric assessment ofClassroom: My Econ LabFableVision Studios
177: 872–881.Article Google Scholar Danas K, Ketkidis P and Roudsari A (2002). A virtual hospital pharmacy inventory: An approach to support unexpected demand. Int J Med Market 2: 125–129.Article Google Scholar Dellaert N and Van de Poel E (1996). Global inventory control in an academic hospital. Int J Prod Econ 46–47: 277–284.Article Google Scholar Downs B, Metters R and Semple J (2001). Managing inventory with multiple products, lags in delivery, resource constraints, and lost sales: A mathematical programming approach. Mngt Sci 47: 464–479.Article Google Scholar Duclos LK (1993). Hospital inventory management for emergency demand. Int J Purch Mater Mngt 29: 30–37. Google Scholar Epstein RH and Dexter F (2000). Economic analysis of linking operating room scheduling and hospital material management information systems for just-in-time inventory control. International Anesthesia Research Society 91: 337–343. Google Scholar Hadley G and Whitin TM (1963). Analysis of Inventory Systems. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, New York. Google Scholar Hill RM (1994). Continuous review lost sales inventory models where two orders may be outstanding. Int J Prod Econ 35: 313–319.Article Google Scholar Hill RM (1999). On the suboptimality of (S−1, S) lost sales inventory policies. Int J Prod Econ 59: 387–393.Article Google Scholar Hill RM and Johansen SG (2006). Optimal and near-optimal policies for lost sales inventory models with at most one replenishment order outstanding. Eur J Opl Res 169: 111–132.Article Google Scholar Janssen F, Heuts R and De Kok T (1998). On the (R, s, Q) inventory model when demand is modelled as a compound Bernoulli process. Eur J Opl Res 104: 423–436.Article Google Scholar Johansen SG and Hill RM (2000). The (r, Q) control of a periodic-review inventory system with continuous demand and lost sales. Int J Prod Econ 68: 279–286.Article Google Scholar Johansen SG and Thorstenson A (1996). Optimal (r, Q) inventory policies with poisson demands and lost sales: Discounted and undiscounted cases. Int J Prod Econ 46–47: 359–371.Article Google Scholar Johansen SG and Thorstenson A (2004). The (r, q) policy for the lost-sales inventory system when more than one order may be outstanding. Working paper L-2004-03, Aarhus School of Business.Johnston DH (1992). Primary supplier. My Econ Lab Question answers. my econ lab question answers chapters and competitive market is one that has many buyers and sellers, so no single buyer orMy Econ Review My Provided Value - YouTube
Edward Harrison here with a Modern Monetary Theory-inspired post. Econ 101 Imagine you and I are the only two people in an economy. For the sake of argument, say we use sea shells as a currency and we trade with no one else but each other. So when we do trade, we exchange goods and services with each other for the amount of sea shells these goods and services are worth. From an accounting perspective, it’s a wash; if you buy my goods, I get the sea shells and lose the goods of equivalent value and if I buy from you, you get the shells and I get the goods of equivalent value. So far, so good. Now, let’s bring a third person into the mix, Harry. Harry is a foreigner with whom who we agree to do business. Where he’s from, he uses silver as his currency. No matter; in trading with Harry, we agree to an exchange rate between our sea shells and his silver and we are ready to go. Now, we can trade with each other and with Harry. If Harry buys from either of us, we get silver and he gets an equivalent value of goods. If we buy from Harry, he gets sea shells and we get the goods, also equivalent in value to the shells. Notice that in both examples there is no value ‘leakage’ in the system. Everyone gets a fair deal, goods for a currency amount equivalent in value to those goods. So, from an accounting perspective, we can trade as much as we want with each other and with Harry and all that is being done is a transfer of goods, services and currency between us. That’s Econ 101. Deficits Now, let’s introduce some deficits and debt into the scenario. Of the bad output and the polluting input is comparable to the two materials balance postulates MB1 and MB2 in Dakpo et al. ([28], p. 352).27.Ayres and Kneese [4] introduced the question of materials balance in economics. In a number of subsequent papers, it has been extensively discussed in the context of production efficiency by a number of authors including Pethig [54]; Coelli, Lauwers, and Van Huylenbroeck [22]; Chambers and Melkonyan [15]; Hampf [42]; Rodseth [69, 70]; and Forsund (2016) among others. See, in particular, Dapko, Jenneauxe, and Latruffe [28].28.Chapters 20 by Ray and 21 by Kumbhakar in this volume of the Handbook cover non-parametric DEA and parametric SFA approaches to measuring productivity growth and technical change.29.For a detailed discussion of non-convexity in general, refer to the chapter 18 by Briec, Kerstens, and Van de SWoestyne in this volume of the Handbook.30.For detailed discussion of DEA from an OR/MS perspective, the reader should refer to Zhu [78] and Cooper, Seiford, and Tone (25). Fare, Grosskopf, and Lovell [36] and Ray [58] explain the economic theory behind DEA.ReferencesAfriat S (1972) Efficiency estimation of production functions. Int Econ Rev 13(3):568–598 Google Scholar Aigner DJ, Lovell CAK, Schmidt P (1977) Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. J Econ 6(1):21–37 Google Scholar Aparicio J, Pastor JT, Ray SC (2013) An overall measure of technical inefficiency at the firm and at the industry level: the ‘lost profit on outlay’. Eur J Oper Res 226(1):154–162 Google Scholar Ayres RU, Kneese AV (1969) Production, consumption, and externalities. Am Econ Rev 59:282–297 Google Scholar Banker RD (1984) Estimating the most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 17(1):35–44 Google Scholar Banker RD, Maindiratta A (1988) Nonparametric analysis of technical and allocative efficiencies in production. Econometrica 56(5):1315–1332 Google Scholar Banker RD, Morey RC (1986) Efficiency analysis for exogenously fixed inputs and outputs. Oper Res 34(4):513–521 Google Scholar Banker RD, Thrall RM (1992) Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 62:74–84 Google Scholar Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci 30(9):1078–1092 Google Scholar Banker RD, Chang H, Natarajan R (2007) Estimating DEA technical and allocative inefficiency using aggregate cost or revenue data. J Prod Anal 27:115–121 Google Scholar Baumol WJ, Panzar JC, Willig RD (1982) Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich. Google Scholar Baumol WJ, Oates WE (1988) The theory of environmental policy, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar Cassell JM (1937) Excess capacity and monopolistic competition. Q J Econ 51(3):426–443 Google Scholar Chambers RG, Melkonyan T (2012) Production technologies, material balance, and the income-environmental quality trade-off. University of Exeter working paper Google Scholar Chambers RG, Chung Y, Färe R (1996) Benefit and distance functions. J Econ Theory 70:407–419 Google Scholar Chambers RG, Chung Y, Färe R (1998) Profit, directional distance functions, and nerlovian efficiency. J Optim Theory Appl 98:351–364 Google Scholar Charnes A,My Econ Lab 5 Flashcards - Quizlet
Mar 2014 🎧 10 years Quote: Originally Posted by johannburkard ➡️ Does the SSL have NE5532/NE5534s on it? Oh, I don’t have a clue on which op amps are in use. Can anyone tell from the components? Attached Thumbnails Quote: Originally Posted by ilikefruit ➡️ Oh, I don’t have a clue on which op amps are in use. Can anyone tell from the components? I see some JRCs. Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2010 Posts: 3,227 🎧 10 years wait, what's that ECON 2 edge connector doing? Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2009 Posts: 1,511 🎧 15 years Gear Maniac Joined: Mar 2016 🎧 5 years Quote: Originally Posted by the fxs ➡️ wait, what's that ECON 2 edge connector doing? IIRC all their 500 series modules have that. Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2014 🎧 10 years Quote: Originally Posted by johannburkard ➡️ I see some JRCs. Can you tell us more?I suppose JRCs aren’t to your liking? Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2014 🎧 10 years Quote: Originally Posted by the fxs ➡️ wait, what's that ECON 2 edge connector doing? I always thought it was for side-chaining or stereo mode like most other 500 modules with EQ and comps. But the manual doesn’t say so I suppose it’s for testing. The normal back connector is called ECON1. Quote: Originally Posted by ilikefruit ➡️ Can you tell us more?I suppose JRCs aren’t to your liking? They're the cheapest of the cheap which in and itself isn't really remarkable (something always is) but SSL using them in a module that's not really budget kind of is.I had a NJM4558 (a '70s design) in a colour module and that thing was very dirty at high frequencies.Source of screenshot Attached Thumbnails Last edited by johannburkard; 18th October 2021 at 08:46 PM..my econ lab 15 Flashcards - Quizlet
The pandemic’s direct impact, leaving room for exploring indirect effects such as changes in consumer behavior, supply chain disruptions, and long-term economic shifts.Table 8 Countries included in strictness and severity groupsFull size tableFuture research could build upon our findings by examining the long-term impacts of the pandemic on different sectors within the stock market. Additionally, studies could explore the role of vaccines, and global supply chain adjustments in shaping market responses to future global crises. A deeper understanding of these aspects would enrich our comprehension of the pandemic’s enduring impact on financial markets and guide strategic decision-making for investors and policymakers. ReferencesAguiar-Conraria L, Martins MM, Soares MJ (2012) The yield curve and the macro-economy across time and frequencies. J Econ Dyn Control 36(12):1950–1970Article Google Scholar Akhtaruzzaman M, Boubaker S, Sensoy A (2021) Financial contagion during COVID-19 crisis. Financ Res Lett 38:101604Article Google Scholar Al-Awadhi AM, Alsaifi K, Al-Awadhi A et al (2020) Death and contagious infectious diseases: impact of the COVID-19 virus on stock market returns. J Behav Exp Financ 27:100326Article Google Scholar Albulescu C (2020) Coronavirus and financial volatility: 40 days of fasting and fear. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.04005Andrada-Félix J, Fernández-Rodríguez F, Sosvilla-Rivero S (2024) A crisis like no other? Financial market analogies of the COVID-19-cum-Ukraine war crisis. North Am J Econ Finance. Google Scholar Anh DLT, Gan C (2020) The impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on stock market performance: evidence from vietnam. J Econ StudAshraf BN (2020) Stock markets’ reaction to COVID-19: cases or fatalities? Res Int Bus Financ 54:101249Article Google Scholar Ashton P (2009) An appetite for yield: the anatomy of the subprime mortgage crisis. Environ Plan A 41(6):1420–1441Article Google Scholar Baek S, Mohanty SK, Glambosky M (2020) COVID-19 and stock market volatility: an industry level analysis. Financ Res Lett 37:101748Article Google Scholar Bai C, Duan Y, Fan. My Econ Lab Question answers. my econ lab question answers chapters and competitive market is one that has many buyers and sellers, so no single buyer or Pearson Higher Education’s My Econ Lab teaches basic economic concepts to college students. FableVision developed five browser-based interactive experiments for My Econ Lab. TheseECON-ZIP-BASE - Belimo ECON-ZIP
Overall Quality Based on 14 ratings14 Student RatingsProfessor Wang was alright. It was a very easy class with little workload and for the most part simple concepts, but he didn't explain things well. His lecture part of the class was for the first 10 minutes of class and the rest was doing examples. Much of the class time was waiting for people to do the work on their own.Graded by few thingsWang's ECON 101 is extremely easy. All quizzes and exams are fully online and open note. You're given a week for each homework assignment. Each assignment only takes about an hour, and there's only 4 assignments. As long as you take basic notes, you'll be good. If you need your global or social perspective, take ECON 101 with Wang.Amazing lectures RespectedSmart person, but lectures were dry. He doesn't use PowerPoint and only talks during lecture, so it was hard for me to follow. Not helpful outside of class. If you miss class, it's on you to get the notes from someone else. Exams are online. We never used the textbook so you don't really need to buy it. Only 2 homework assignments. Overall not bad.Lecture heavyOnline SavvyExtremely knowledgable and smart, good at explaining the material. Lectures are interesting based on the subject itself, but no fluff otherwise. All online quizzes and exams, and homework consists of a couple assignment sheets throughout the semester. Helpful outside of class and answers student questions thoroughly.Lecture heavyAccessible outside classActually best teacher in RIT.Comments
Cooper WW (1968) Programming with linear fractional functionals. Nav Res Logist Q 15:517–522 Google Scholar Charnes AC, Cooper WW, Mellon B (1952) Blending aviation gasolines – a study in programming interdependent activities in an integrated oil company. Econometrica 20(2):135–159 Google Scholar Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2(6):429–444 Google Scholar Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1979) Short communication: measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 3(4):339 Google Scholar Coelli T, Lauwers L, Van Huylenbroeck GV (2007) Environmental efficiency measurement and the materials balance condition. J Prod Anal 28:3–12 Google Scholar Cooper WW, Thompson RG, Thrall RM (1996) Introduction: extensions and new developments in DEA. Ann Oper Res 66:3–45 Google Scholar Cooper WW, Park SK, Pastor JT (1999) RAM: a range adjusted measure of inefficiency for use with additive models, and relations to other models and measures in DEA. J Prod Anal 11:5–42 Google Scholar Cooper WW, Seiford L, Tone K (2002) Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with uses, example applications, references and DEA-solver software. Kluwer, Norwell Google Scholar Cropper ML, Oates WE (1992) Environmental economics: a survey. J Econ Lit 30:675–740 Google Scholar Dantzig GB (1951) Maximization of a linear function of variables subject to linear inequalities. In: Koopmans TC (ed) Activity analysis of production and allocation. Wiley, New York, pp 339–347 Google Scholar Dapko KH, Jeanneauxe P, Latruffe L (2016) Modeling pollution generating technologies in performance benchmarking: recent developments, limits, and future prospects in the non-parametric framework. Eur J Oper Res 250:347–359 Google Scholar Debreu G (1951) The coefficient of resource utilization. Econometrica 19(3):273–292 Google Scholar Färe R, Grosskopf S (2003) Nonparametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs: comment. Am J Agric Econ 85:1070–1074 Google Scholar Färe R, Lovell CAK (1978) Measuring the technical efficiency of production. J Econ Theory 19(1):150–162 Google Scholar Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK (1985) The measurement of efficiency of production. Kluwer-Nijhoff, Boston Google Scholar Färe R, Grosskopf S, Kokkelenberg EC (1989) Measuring plant capacity, utilization and technical change: a nonparametric approach. Int Econ Rev 30(3):655–666 Google Scholar Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK, Pasurka C (1989) Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: a non-parametric approach. Rev Econ Stat 71(1):90–98 Google Scholar Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK, Yaisawarng S (1993) Derivation of shadow prices for undesirable outputs: a distance function approach. Rev Econ Stat 75:374–380 Google Scholar Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK (1994) Production frontiers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar Färe R, Grosskopf S, Noh DW, Weber W (2005) Characteristics of a polluting technology: theory and practice. J Econ 126:469–492 Google Scholar Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of technical efficiency. J R Stat Soc Ser A Gen 120(Part 3):253–281 Google Scholar Førsund F (2009) Good modelling of bad outputs: pollution and multiple-output production. Int Rev Environ Resour Econ 3(1):1–38 Google Scholar Førsund F (2018) Multi-equation modeling of desirable and undesirable outputs satisfying the material balance. Empir Econ, online 54(1):67–99 Google Scholar Frisch
2025-04-20R (1965) Theory of production. Rand McNally and Company, Chicago Google Scholar Hampf B (2014) Separating environmental efficiency into production and abatement efficiency: a nonparametric model with application to US power plants. J Prod Anal 41:457–473 Google Scholar Hanoch G, Rothschild M (1972) Testing the assumptions of production theory: a nonparametric approach. J Polit Econ 80(2):256–275 Google Scholar Johansen L (1968) Production functions and the concept of capacity. Reprinted in Førsund FR (ed) Collected works of Leif Johansen, vol 1. North Holland, Amsterdam Google Scholar Koopmans TJ (1951) Analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. In: Koopmans TJ (ed) Activity analysis of production and allocation. Wiley, New York, pp 33–97 Google Scholar Koopmans TJ (1957) Three essays on the state of economic science. McGraw Hill, New York Google Scholar Kumbhakar S, Lovell CAK (2000) Stochastic frontier analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York Google Scholar Leleu H, Briec W (2009) A DEA estimation of a lower bound for firms’ allocative efficiency without information on price data. Int J Prod Econ 121:203–211 Google Scholar Lozano SC (2015) A joint-inputs network DEA approach to production and pollution-generating technologies. Expert Syst Appl 42:7960–7968 Google Scholar Luenberger DG (1992) Benefit functions and duality. J Math Econ 21:115–145 Google Scholar Murty S, Russell RR (2016) Modeling emission-generating technologies: reconciliation of axiomatic and by-production approaches. Empir Econ 54(1):7–30 Google Scholar Murty S, Russell R, Levkoff SB (2012) On modeling pollution-generating technologies. J Environ Econ Manag 64:117–135 Google Scholar Pastor JT, Louis JL, Sirvent I (1999) An enhanced DEA Russell-graph efficiency measure. Eur J Oper Res 115:596–607 Google Scholar Pethig R (2006) Non-linear production, abatement, pollution and materials balance reconsidered. J Environ Econ Manag 51:185–204 Google Scholar Portela MCAS, Thanassoulis E (2005) Profitability of a sample of Portuguese bank branches and its decomposition into technical and allocative components. Eur J Oper Res 162(3):850–866 Google Scholar Ray SC (1988) Data envelopment analysis, non-discretionary inputs and efficiency: an alternative interpretation. Socio Econ Plan Sci 22(4):167–176 Google Scholar Ray SC (1991) Resource-use efficiency in public schools: a study of Connecticut data. Manag Sci 37(12):1620–1628 Google Scholar Ray SC (2004) Data envelopment analysis: theory and techniques for economics and operations research. Cambridge University Press, New York Google Scholar Ray SC (2007) Shadow profit maximization and a measure of overall inefficiency. J Prod Anal 27:231–236 Google Scholar Ray SC (2009) Are Indian firms too small? A nonparametric analysis of cost efficiency and the optimal organization of industry in Indian manufacturing. Indian Econ Rev XXXXVI(1):49–67 Google Scholar Ray SC (2010) A one-step procedure for returns to scale classification of decision making units in data envelopment analysis. University of Connecticut Economics working paper 2010-07 Google Scholar Ray SC (2015) Nonparametric measures of scale economies and capacity utilization: an application to U.S. manufacturing. Eur J Oper Res 245:602–611 Google Scholar Ray SC, Ghose A (2014) Production efficiency in Indian agriculture: an assessment of the post green revolution years. Omega 44:58–69 Google Scholar Ray SC, Jeon Y (2009) Reputation and efficiency: a non-parametric assessment of
2025-04-20177: 872–881.Article Google Scholar Danas K, Ketkidis P and Roudsari A (2002). A virtual hospital pharmacy inventory: An approach to support unexpected demand. Int J Med Market 2: 125–129.Article Google Scholar Dellaert N and Van de Poel E (1996). Global inventory control in an academic hospital. Int J Prod Econ 46–47: 277–284.Article Google Scholar Downs B, Metters R and Semple J (2001). Managing inventory with multiple products, lags in delivery, resource constraints, and lost sales: A mathematical programming approach. Mngt Sci 47: 464–479.Article Google Scholar Duclos LK (1993). Hospital inventory management for emergency demand. Int J Purch Mater Mngt 29: 30–37. Google Scholar Epstein RH and Dexter F (2000). Economic analysis of linking operating room scheduling and hospital material management information systems for just-in-time inventory control. International Anesthesia Research Society 91: 337–343. Google Scholar Hadley G and Whitin TM (1963). Analysis of Inventory Systems. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, New York. Google Scholar Hill RM (1994). Continuous review lost sales inventory models where two orders may be outstanding. Int J Prod Econ 35: 313–319.Article Google Scholar Hill RM (1999). On the suboptimality of (S−1, S) lost sales inventory policies. Int J Prod Econ 59: 387–393.Article Google Scholar Hill RM and Johansen SG (2006). Optimal and near-optimal policies for lost sales inventory models with at most one replenishment order outstanding. Eur J Opl Res 169: 111–132.Article Google Scholar Janssen F, Heuts R and De Kok T (1998). On the (R, s, Q) inventory model when demand is modelled as a compound Bernoulli process. Eur J Opl Res 104: 423–436.Article Google Scholar Johansen SG and Hill RM (2000). The (r, Q) control of a periodic-review inventory system with continuous demand and lost sales. Int J Prod Econ 68: 279–286.Article Google Scholar Johansen SG and Thorstenson A (1996). Optimal (r, Q) inventory policies with poisson demands and lost sales: Discounted and undiscounted cases. Int J Prod Econ 46–47: 359–371.Article Google Scholar Johansen SG and Thorstenson A (2004). The (r, q) policy for the lost-sales inventory system when more than one order may be outstanding. Working paper L-2004-03, Aarhus School of Business.Johnston DH (1992). Primary supplier
2025-04-11